Named Amputations — Syme, Chopart, Lisfranc, Boyd, Pirogoff and the Levels of Limb Amputation

Written & medically reviewed by the Kinase Medical Team · Last reviewed

Quick Answer

Lower-limb amputations are named by level. Forefoot: toe, ray, transmetatarsal. Midfoot: Lisfranc (tarsometatarsal joint) and Chopart (talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints). Hindfoot: Syme (tibiotalar disarticulation with heel-pad cover), Boyd and Pirogoff (tibio-calcaneal fusion). Above that come below-knee, knee disarticulation, above-knee and hip disarticulation.

How are lower-limb amputations named and grouped?

Most named amputations are eponymous disarticulations or bone cuts at a fixed level of the foot. A widely used classification groups the foot amputations as forefoot (toe disarticulation, ray, transmetatarsal), midfoot (Lisfranc, Chopart) and hindfoot (Syme, Boyd, Pirogoff, modified Pirogoff), and then continues with the transtibial, through-knee, transfemoral and hip levels.

The same classification separates distal (minor) amputations, where the tibial weight-bearing stump is preserved, from proximal (major) amputations, where it cannot be preserved. The first amputation in a diabetic foot should preferably be a minor (distal) one. Some authors, however, treat the Syme amputation as a major amputation, so check the definition a question uses.

Types of AmputationShort overview of the levels of limb amputation from partial foot to above the knee.Video: Daniel Rinella · 2:11 · Watch on YouTube · Loads from YouTube (privacy-enhanced mode) only when you press play.

What does each amputation level involve?

Named lower-limb amputations at a glance
AmputationLevelKey point
Toe disarticulationThrough the toe jointThe most frequent and least invasive lower-limb amputation
Ray amputationToe plus part of the metatarsalAllows more adequate debridement of septic margins than toe disarticulation
TransmetatarsalAcross the metatarsalsRisk of equinovarus from unopposed ankle tendons
LisfrancTarsometatarsal jointMidfoot; rarely performed in diabetic foot
ChopartTalonavicular and calcaneocuboid jointsLeaves only the talus and calcaneum (hindfoot)
SymeTibiotalar (ankle) disarticulationMalleoli resected; heel pad covers the tibia; end-bearing
Boyd / PirogoffHindfoot with tibio-calcaneal fusionBetter stability and length than Syme
Below-knee (BKA)TranstibialAbout 47% of all lower-limb amputations
Knee disarticulationThrough the knee, femur intactAbout 2 to 3% of lower-limb amputations
Above-knee (AKA)TransfemoralWalking energy cost 60 to 100% above normal
Hip disarticulation / hemipelvectomyHip joint / hemipelvisUnder 1% of lower-limb amputations

What are toe, ray and transmetatarsal amputations?

Toe disarticulation is the commonest and least invasive amputation. A ray amputation removes a toe together with part of its metatarsal, which gives a better chance of clearing infected margins. Indications for a ray amputation include wet or dry toe gangrene, osteomyelitis of the metatarsal head or proximal phalanx, septic arthritis of the metatarsophalangeal joint and gross toe infection.

A transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) is considered when gangrene or infection is confined to the forefoot. Suggested inclusion criteria for a ray amputation include one or two palpable pedal pulses, ankle-brachial index of at least 0.8 and toe-brachial index of at least 0.7; the transmetatarsal level uses the same inclusion criteria.

What is the difference between Lisfranc and Chopart amputation?

Both are midfoot disarticulations. Lisfranc amputation is a disarticulation through the tarsometatarsal joint. Chopart amputation is a disarticulation through the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints, leaving only the talus and calcaneum behind. Lisfranc is therefore more distal; Chopart leaves a shorter foot.

Oblique radiograph of a foot with a green line drawn across the junction of the hindfoot and midfoot and a red line across the bases of the metatarsals.
The Chopart joint line (proximal, green) lies between the hindfoot and midfoot; the Lisfranc joint line (distal, red) lies at the tarsometatarsal joints.Image: Hellerhoff, CC BY-SA 3.0
Lisfranc vs Chopart amputation
FeatureLisfrancChopart
Joint levelTarsometatarsalTalonavicular + calcaneocuboid
What remainsTarsal bones are retainedTalus and calcaneum only
Typical indicationExtensive forefoot soft tissue loss, traumaExtensive forefoot soft tissue loss, trauma
Share of lower-limb amputationsUnder 1%Under 1%
Energy costHigher than Syme, lower than BKAHigher than Syme, lower than BKA

The primary indication is extensive soft tissue loss of the forefoot, often from trauma, although they can be elective. Because the residual limb is longer than a below-knee stump, these patients can usually walk short distances without a prosthesis. In diabetic foot infection they are rarely performed because of a high failure rate, and reports describe a substantial proportion needing a later below-knee amputation.

What are Syme, Boyd and Pirogoff amputations?

Syme amputation (ankle disarticulation) is a disarticulation of the tibiotalar joint with resection of the malleoli, using the heel pad to cover the end of the tibia. Preserving the heel pad allows end-bearing: patients can bear weight on the stump, and the walking energy cost is only slightly above normal. It is relatively rare, about 1 to 2% of lower-limb amputations.

  • Indications: severe foot deformity, chronic infection, malignancy, localised trauma, and congenital anomalies such as longitudinal fibular deficiency and proximal femoral focal deficiency.
  • Selection in diabetes: at least a palpable posterior tibial pulse and an ankle-brachial index above 0.5.
  • Disadvantages: unstable calcaneal flap, risk of devascularisation of the flap when the calcaneum is dissected out, and a shorter stump with leg-length discrepancy, which makes barefoot walking difficult.
  • Heel-pad migration is prevented by supramalleolar resection or Achilles tenodesis.

The Boyd and Pirogoff amputations were designed to give better results than a Syme amputation. Both retain the calcaneum (wholly or in part) and achieve tibio-calcaneal bony fusion, which stabilises the flap, reduces devascularisation (the calcaneum is not dissected out), minimises limb-length discrepancy and permits full weight-bearing with less need for a prosthesis. Pirogoff amputation, described by Nicolas Pirogoff in 1864, partially preserves the calcaneus and is suited to necrosis distal to the Lisfranc and Chopart joints with preserved blood flow in the calcaneus.

SymesBrief look at the Syme (ankle disarticulation) amputation and the end-bearing residual limb.Video: Hanger Clinic · 1:01 · Watch on YouTube · Loads from YouTube (privacy-enhanced mode) only when you press play.

How do below-knee, knee and above-knee amputations compare?

Below-knee (transtibial) amputation is one of the commonest, about 47% of all lower-limb amputations, and is done most often for peripheral arterial disease, diabetes-related complications and trauma. Preserving the knee gives better function: walking costs only 10 to 40% more energy than normal.

Above-knee (AKA) and transfemoral amputations together account for about 27% and are often done in emergencies for critical limb ischaemia or severe infection. Losing the knee raises the energy cost of walking to 60 to 100% above normal, and the prosthesis is more complex. Knee disarticulation (2 to 3%) is chosen when the knee cannot be saved but the femur is intact, and its energy cost sits between BKA and AKA. Hip disarticulation and hemipelvectomy are rare (under 1%), usually for malignancy, severe trauma or life-threatening infection.

Side view of a leg with horizontal lines marking amputation levels from toe disarticulation up to hemipelvectomy.
Levels of lower-limb amputation from toe disarticulation to hemipelvectomy; the more proximal the level, the greater the loss of joint function.Image: Edwin khundi, CC BY-SA 4.0
Energy cost of walking by level (relative to non-amputees)
LevelApproximate energy cost
SymeSlightly higher than normal
Lisfranc / ChopartHigher than Syme, lower than BKA
Below-knee10 to 40% higher
Knee disarticulationHigher than BKA, lower than AKA
Above-knee60 to 100% higher

What are the common exam traps with named amputations?

  • Lisfranc = tarsometatarsal joint; Chopart = talonavicular + calcaneocuboid. Do not swap them.
  • Syme = ankle (tibiotalar) disarticulation with heel-pad cover. The malleoli are resected.
  • Boyd and Pirogoff add tibio-calcaneal fusion; Pirogoff partially preserves the calcaneus.
  • Transmetatarsal amputation → equinovarus. Treated with Achilles lengthening and split tibialis anterior transfer.
  • Distal (minor) amputations preserve the tibial weight-bearing stump; BKA and above are major.
  • Syme in the diabetic foot needs a palpable posterior tibial pulse and ABI above 0.5.
  • Energy cost rises with level: Syme lowest, BKA 10 to 40%, AKA 60 to 100%.

Frequently asked questions

What is Chopart amputation?
It is a midfoot disarticulation through the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid joints, which leaves only the talus and calcaneum (the hindfoot). It is uncommon, under 1% of lower-limb amputations, and is mainly used for extensive soft tissue loss of the forefoot, often after trauma.
What is Lisfranc amputation?
It is a disarticulation at the tarsometatarsal joint, more distal than Chopart. It removes the forefoot but retains the tarsal bones, so the residual foot is longer. It is uncommon, under 1% of lower-limb amputations, and rarely used in diabetic foot infection because of its high failure rate.
What is a Syme amputation?
Syme amputation is an ankle disarticulation through the tibiotalar joint with resection of the malleoli. The heel pad is used to cover the end of the tibia, so the stump can bear weight directly (end-bearing). It accounts for about 1 to 2% of lower-limb amputations and gives excellent function when the heel pad stays in place.
How do Boyd and Pirogoff amputations differ from Syme?
Boyd and Pirogoff retain the calcaneum and fuse it to the tibia, which stabilises the heel flap, reduces devascularisation and preserves leg length. A Syme removes the calcaneum and ends at the tibia, leaving a shorter stump. Pirogoff, described in 1864, partially preserves the calcaneus.
Which patients are suitable for a Syme amputation in diabetes?
Selection criteria quoted in the literature are a palpable posterior tibial pulse and an ankle-brachial index above 0.5, with strict selection, because the heel flap depends on that blood supply. Poor perfusion risks flap necrosis, and the calcaneal flap can become unstable or devascularised after dissection.
What complication follows a transmetatarsal amputation?
Amputation at the metatarsal level leaves the gastrocnemius, tibialis anterior and tibialis posterior unopposed by the foot, producing an equinovarus deformity. Tendo-Achilles lengthening and split tibialis anterior tendon transfer can correct this, and special footwear is needed. Wound-healing problems and re-operation are common.
What is the difference between a minor and a major amputation?
In the proposed diabetic-foot classification, a distal or minor amputation preserves the tibial weight-bearing stump, whereas a proximal or major amputation does not. Forefoot, midfoot and hindfoot levels are minor; below-knee and above are major. Some authors count Syme as major, so read the question carefully.
How does amputation level affect walking energy?
The more proximal the level, the greater the energy cost. Syme is only slightly above normal, below-knee amputees use about 10 to 40% more energy, and above-knee amputees use 60 to 100% more because the knee joint is lost. Knee disarticulation falls between the two.

Sources

  1. Distal amputations for the diabetic foot (Diabetes Metab Res / PMC, 2013)
  2. Understanding Functional and Hemodynamic Outcomes Across Lower Extremity Amputation Levels (PMC, 2025)
  3. Rehabilitation of a Patient with Pirogoff Amputation and Two-year Follow-up (Prog Rehabil Med, 2021)
  4. Wikimedia Commons — Fussgelenke.jpg (Lisfranc and Chopart joint lines; image licence page)
  5. Wikimedia Commons — Lower limb amputation levels.jpg (image licence page)

For exam preparation and education only — not a substitute for clinical judgement or local guidelines. How we write and review these pages: editorial policy.

Revise Amputations — Named Types with questions

Kinase: NEET-PG & INICET has previous-year papers, a subject-wise QBank and Grand Tests with explanations — on Android, iOS and the web.